Maksim Shved’s documentary [Belarus: Marshrut perabudavany] / Belarus: Marshrut perestroen / Belarus: Recalculating Route (2020, Belarus) began with a simple premise: recording conversations between taxi drivers and passengers to capture the mood before the 2020 Belarusian presidential election. Instead of wrapping on election night as planned, Shved kept his camera rolling on the streets of Minsk, where mass protests erupted following the falsified election results – he realised the real story was just getting started.
The title, Recalculating Route (a more accurate and sometimes used translation is Route Recalculated), employs a driving metaphor to convey the film’s transformation by the very events it set out to observe, along with the country’s uncertain future. Shved himself faced a ‘recalculated route’ after the election: while filming the protests, he was detained, beaten, and jailed alongside thousands of Belarusians for participating in ‘mass unauthorised events’. The resulting film captures a society on the brink of upheaval while also foreshadowing the stalled transformation and repression that would define Belarus after 2020.
Produced by the independent Russian-language network Nastoiashchee vremia / Current Time, part of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the 54-minute documentary was initially conceived as a portrait of the pre-election mood in a country that has had only one president, Aliaksandr Lukashenka, since 1994. Elegant in the simplicity of its premise and techniques, Belarus: Recalculating Route captures a fleeting moment: a society suspended between two futures. Rather than reproducing the spectacular imagery that came to define international coverage of the 2020 protests, this documentary foregrounds the psychological forces behind the headlines – hope, fear, desire, frustration, indignation, and ambivalence – lending context, nuance, and specificity to the universal narrative of society revolting against a dictator. It documents not just the forces driving dissent but also the confusion, uncertainty, and fragmentation amid the mass movement.
The film opens by following its two protagonists, taxi drivers Pavel and Anna Mikhailovna (Hanna Mikhaĭlaŭna), as they begin their workdays in the Belarusian cities of Minsk and Baranavichy. Over mundane shots of public spaces, a radio broadcast reports on the upcoming presidential election. Throughout the film, radio broadcasts provide important context, including explanations of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaia’s candidacy following the arrest of her husband, political blogger and activist Sergey Tikhanovsky (Siarheĭ Tsikhanoŭski). One early sequence captures the film’s central tension: OMON (AMAP) riot police jog through a park in black balaclavas, passing in front of a woman in a wedding dress, reminding viewers that ordinary, private celebrations in Belarus always occur in the shadow of state violence.
The film’s structure centres on conversations between the drivers and their passengers, people of all ages, social backgrounds, and political opinions. The drivers themselves are forthright about their political views: Pavel supports the opposition candidate Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaia, while Anna Mikhailovna is sceptical that regime change could bring tangible improvement and prefers the stability of Lukashenka’s rule. Exchanges move fluidly between the current political situation and everyday concerns, lending an aura of spontaneity and authenticity to the dialogue. Shot primarily from fixed dashboard-mounted angles, these encounters unfold in a restrained, observational style associated with the cinéma-vérité tradition, positioning the viewer as a detached witness.
Filming conversations inside taxis serves both formal and thematic functions. It allows the film to situate abstract political discussion within the physical landscapes of Belarus, maintaining spatial continuity while visually grounding each exchange. This enclosed, mobile setting also creates a suspended temporal zone: removed from everyday pressures, passengers engage in spontaneous, often unexpectedly candid conversations, reflecting the particular intimacy of chance encounters. The interplay of movement and stillness characteristic of a taxi ride mirrors the film’s historical moment; as the elections approach, Belarusian society builds momentum towards mass collective action, yet remains politically and structurally immobile.
The use of taxis was also a practical decision. As Shved explained in a 2023 profile for Voice of America, filming interviews in a semi-private space helped ensure the safety of participants and crew, a top priority of the documentary team. However, the film ventures into public space to film opposition meetings, including a rally in Minsk where Tsikhanouskaia leads hundreds of supporters, including Pavel, in a chant: “I can change everything!” This display of optimism is tempered by Anna Mikhailovna’s scepticism in other scenes, underscoring the political divisions between people of different generations, social groups, and worldviews. Viewed retrospectively, these scenes acquire the weight of pre-traumatic testimony, capturing a fleeting moment of hope amidst uncertainty before the mass arrests, exile, and consolidation of authoritarian control that reshaped Belarusian public life.